Nothing else to do, flipping through "Reading" magazine, in an article discussing technological innovation so that people read for a while the taste is not quite the words: "as many high-tech development zone, you can set Guinness Daquan; Zone created by the high-tech little, you can also set Guinness Daquan. "
The two "Guinness Filmography" accurate to say whether the statistical basis, outsiders do not know, but compared with the widespread across the country's "high-tech development zone," the large number of zones created by these "high-tech "too few, low quality, but can feel the fact, and have yet to see" the overall turnaround was "a clear sign. Economist, said that more than ten years ago, we built on the claim that China's Silicon Valley, Zhongguancun should, and now the fact that the distance between the Silicon Valley is widening.
Why do this? Tracing the source that people have crossed the technical level, her eyes to the system level and concept level. This is of course true, but the point of view heard and seen before, but most emphasis on "concept than system", and the reasons simple and straightforward: the system is determined by the mindset of the people, the system lost the concept, it becomes the water without a source. Right theoretical point is: "system is nothing more than the existence of the concept of materialized form, without the right idea there is no scientific system, so higher than the system concept."
For such a conclusion, the author is not always a kind of sense of security - not to say that "concept than system" does not make sense, but that the practice of people in the present is so much going on. Also take the two had just "Guinness Book" example, our high-tech zones whether the idea is more a lack of technological innovation, or is it more a lack of technological innovation system? I believe most people the answer is the latter. From government officials, enterprise IT management to numerous elite eloquent speech, statements and articles see, people in the "idea" of the nature is not inferior to others, but if they come up with and strictly enforce a "materialization" of these "ideas" of the system, really protect and mobilize the enthusiasm of technological innovation, but often far from satisfactory. The Marx said long ago: an action is important for more than a dozen Gangling.
Ancient China had "easier" and "difficult to know easily," the debate, to Hu has added a "difficult to know and difficult" proposition. Serious discussion of them, these types of claims are justified, only difference is the problem and what to use in any occasion. To fight against corruption, for example, Chen Yun, 20 years ago that "the ruling party's work style is the party of life and death issue", this concept is quite a high not profound, but the party's work style has not been very satisfactory solution, so only the nowadays of the "system corruption," the emphasis.
High-tech development as well. Including IT, including technology innovation, China's main problem now is not philosophy in place, but the system and the implementation of the system are not in place, from this perspective, the current emphasis on "system than ideas", should be less than emphasis on "higher than the system concept "more valuable.
Recommended links:
AVI to FLV
"Actual Recruitment" Are You Afraid Of When The "free Labor"?
Wealth Life - Interview with Dr. Xin Rong Record
Lead time And queuing time
You may not know! Thunder carry with THEM the know-how to download content
Recommend Kids Education
Dell's Large-scale Expansion Of Production Capacity In China, Said To Wait And See Who Is The Fi
3GP to MOV
Infomation Seasonal - SCREEN Savers
CorelDRAW Based cartoon series (1)
ASF TO MPG
Interview with B & Q (China) Vice President, HUMAN Resources Director Miss Hu Weiyan
quot failed to start because d3dx9 30.dll was not
No comments:
Post a Comment